Monthly HR blog Newsletter – April 2024 | Consensus HR, Herts, Beds
Welcome
In this months blogs recap from a selection of our March 2024, blogs we discuss:
- Hilton Foods Solutions Ltd v Wright – Parental leave: Detriment for seeking to take | Consensus HR | Herts, Beds
- Our Employment Law Newsletter – March 2024
- Workplace mental health service firm faces investigation
- Ayche v The Hop Box Ltd – Disability discrimination: Reasonable adjustment
Hilton Foods Solutions Ltd v Wright – Parental leave: Detriment for seeking to take | Consensus HR | Herts, Beds
To be protected against suffering a detriment for seeking to take parental leave, an employee does not formally have to apply to take the leave.
Note for employers:
This provides useful clarity on a particular point of law, and with family related rights under the spotlight as new entitlements are given and existing ones are changed, anything that makes the management of these clearer would be welcomed by employers.
As a result of this case, employers should bear in mind that the protection offered under the regulations arise even where an informal request or indication to make one has been made, and that this protection applies before two years’ service is reached. Employees who make such enquiries or indications should be treated reasonably and fairly both in relation to their leave request and in any other unrelated proceedings or processes that are undertaken.
Our Employment Law Newsletter – March 2024
Welcome to our latest employment law newsletter. In this newsletter, we are focusing exclusively on the changes that will come into force in April 2024.
Workplace mental health service firm faces investigation | Consensus HR | Herts, Beds
Claims about one of the UK’s biggest providers of workplace mental health services are to be investigated by the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP), it has said. BBC Radio 4’s File on 4 programmes has heard allegations that calls from vulnerable people to Health Assured were not always handled properly.
Ayche v The Hop Box Ltd – Disability discrimination: Reasonable adjustment | Consensus HR – Herts, Beds
Note for employers
This case serves as a useful reminder that the obligation to make a reasonable adjustment is firmly on the employer, and it is not enough to simply rely on the employee to find an appropriate “workaround” to a PCP that puts them at a substantial disadvantage because of their disability.
In this case, had the respondent gone back to the claimant regarding the mask, and queried how the claimant was finding having to wear one, it would have become apparent that the mask was not being worn as intended and therefore a more suitable adjustment would have to have been found. By seemingly moving on from the matter without fully dealing with it, the respondent failed to discharge its duties under the EqA and must now wait to hear the outcome of this case, and if any compensation will be owed to the claimant.
To view more about our range of HR & Employment Law Services
Are you concerned about keeping your business up to date with Employment Law changes?
Your Outsourced Human Resources (HR) Department.
For further information on any of the HR subjects we provide, please click the heading below: